EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The EV Chasm and Korea’s Battery Sector: A Deep Dive into the Current Slump

Kyung In Hwang ()
Additional contact information
Kyung In Hwang: Korea Institute for Industrial Economics and Trade, Postal: Sejong National Research Complex, Korea Institute for Industrial Economics and Trade, 370 Sicheong Dae-ro C-dong 8-12F 30147, Republic of Korea, http://www.kiet.re.kr

No 24/11, Research Papers from Korea Institute for Industrial Economics and Trade

Abstract: Concerns over the recent downturn in the battery industry are growing, primarily due to the slowdown in the electric vehicle (EV) industry, which accounts for 70 to 80 percent of total battery demand. The market for battery electric vehicles (BEVs), or cars powered entirely by rechargeable batteries, has entered a contractionary phase in Europe, has shrunk by 2.2 percent in the first half of 2024. BEV sales growth has also fallen off in the United States, recording just four percent growth in the first half of 2024, a steep decline from the 54-percent-growth figure posted in 2023. Battery makers had a rough 2024, largely due to the slowdown in BEV sales as well as price declines caused by falling prices for minerals and other key battery ingredients. There are some positives, however, including the prospect for a demand recovery in Europe as the bloc introduces stricter regulations on carbon emissions, and as the prices of important raw materials begin to stabilize. But the second administration of current US President Donald Trump poses an enormous risk to battery makers worldwide. Up to this point, American battery demand has lifted the fortunes of South Korean battery makers. But if the Trump administration follows through with its threats to repeal, revise, or retract some of the critical incentives of the Inflation Reduction Act, demand for Korean batteries could collapse, sending shockwaves through the industry. Nevertheless, batteries are poised to remain a core technology in global electrification, decarbonization, and digital transformation efforts, and in the long run, the industry is likely to continue down a path of structural growth. This paper proposes a two-pronged policy package designed to help Korean battery makers navigate these choppy waters. First, it is essential for South Korea to persuade the new US administration to shape future battery policies in a way that is favorable to South Korea by emphasizing the achievements of Korean investments in the United States and Korean companies’ efforts to establish a battery supply chain outside the Chinese sphere of influence. Second, since the market is likely to rebound at some point, it is crucial to expand tax incentives and increase R&D funding to ensure that Korean companies can continue making investments even during periods of business turbulence.

Keywords: secondary batteries; rechargeable batteries; electric vehicles; EVs; battery industry; LG Energy Solution; SK On; Samsung SDI; CATL; Xiaomi; BYD; South Korea; China; Korea Institute for Industrial Economics and Trade; KIET (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: L62 L65 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 12 pages
Date: 2024-11-29
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.kiet.re.kr/en/pub/economyDetailView?de ... pe=&sval=&pg=1&pp=10 Full text (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ris:kietrp:2024_011

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Research Papers from Korea Institute for Industrial Economics and Trade Sejong National Research Complex, Korea Institute for Industrial Economics and Trade, 370 Sicheong Dae-ro C-dong 8-12F 30147, Republic of Korea. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Aaron Crossen ().

 
Page updated 2025-04-19
Handle: RePEc:ris:kietrp:2024_011