The Stern Review: an assessment of its methodology

Rick Baker, Andrew Barker, Alan Johnston and Michael Kohlhaas

Staff Working Papers from Productivity Commission, Government of Australia

Abstract: The Productivity Commission today released a staff working paper titled The Stern Review: an assessment of its methodology. This technical paper contains a detailed examination of key elements of the Review’s analytical approach. Originally prepared as an internal research memorandum following release of the Stern Review’s report, the paper is being made more widely available given its ongoing relevance in light of Australia’s Garnaut Review. The staff paper finds that the Stern Review made some important analytical advances. The Review sought to move beyond analysis based on the mean expected outcome to one that incorporates low probability, but potentially catastrophic, events at the tail of probability distributions. The Review also attempted a more comprehensive coverage of damage costs than most previous studies. The paper also finds that value judgements and ethical perspectives in key parts of the Stern Review’s analysis led to estimates of future economic damages being substantially higher, and abatement costs lower, than most previous studies. The paper notes that the report could usefully have included more sensitivity analysis to highlight to decision-makers the consequences of alternative assumptions or judgements. The views expressed in this paper are those of the staff involved and do not necessarily reflect those of the Productivity Commission.

Keywords: climate change; greenhouse effect; global warming (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Z00 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 125 pages.
Date: 2008-01
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Published by the Productivity Commission, Australia.

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.pc.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/74723/sternreview.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found (http://www.pc.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/74723/sternreview.pdf [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.pc.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/74723/sternreview.pdf)
http://www.pc.gov.au/research/staffworkingpaper/sternreview (text/html)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found (http://www.pc.gov.au/research/staffworkingpaper/sternreview [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.pc.gov.au/research/staffworkingpaper/sternreview)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ris:prodsw:0801

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Staff Working Papers from Productivity Commission, Government of Australia Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MAPS ().