The Boulding-Richardson Model Revisited
Susan Gattke () and
Lennart Reimer ()
Additional contact information
Susan Gattke: Helmut Schmidt University, Hamburg, Postal: Chair for Public Economics, Holstenhofweg 85, 22043 Hamburg
Lennart Reimer: Helmut Schmidt University, Hamburg, Postal: Chair for Public Economics, Holstenhofweg 85, 22043 Hamburg
No 159/2015, Working Paper from Helmut Schmidt University, Hamburg
We review, and extend, one of the classic dynamic models of conflict in economics by Richardson (1919) and Boulding (1962). It turns out that the stability properties of the model change if one takes a more realistic “incrementalist” view, and that chance / friction can easily be incorporated into the standard model by defining a probability of (de-)escalation. This analysis is not just a study in the history of economic thought, but also relevant for the development of simulation models for the analysis of conflict dynamics.
Keywords: conflict dynamics; psychology of aggression; escalation; stability; patterns of conflict (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: B25 D74 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 12 pages
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cmp, nep-hme and nep-hpe
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.hsu-hh.de/fgvwl/index_fwovB9jCzqvopQLp.html Full text (application/pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ris:vhsuwp:2015_159
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Paper from Helmut Schmidt University, Hamburg Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Klaus Bekcmann ().