Neoclassical Inflation: No theory there
Discussion Papers from Research on Money and Finance
The theoretical generalization that the price level is determined by the quantity of money is commonly employed as a teaching device, in abstract modeling, and as a guide to policy. It represents a profound misunderstanding of inflation. In specific, the famous parable, more money then more inflation, is logically wrong. Far from the strength of neoclassical economics, its theory of inflation encapsulates and epitomizes its most fatal analytical errors and contradictions. Prominent among these errors and contradictions are the failure to provide a convincing explanation for the existence of money, and the closely related inability to provide a definition of money that makes its supply analytically determinate. These basic problems require the creation of an imaginary economy, the analysis of which results in arbitrary conclusions that cannot be generalized beyond neoclassical Cloud-Cuckoo Land.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 500 Can't connect to researchonmoneyandfinance.org:80 (No such host is known. )
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rmf:dpaper:33
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Discussion Papers from Research on Money and Finance
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).