Bidding Rings in Repeated Auctions

Andrzej Skrzypacz and Hugo Hopenhayn

No 463, RCER Working Papers from University of Rochester - Center for Economic Research (RCER)

Abstract: This paper considers the question of tacit collusion in repeated auctions with independent private values. McAfee and McMillan show that the extent of collusion is limited by the availability of transfers. If no transfers are possible, the private information of bidders precludes any collusive scheme beyond bid rotation (BRS), even when the cartel has unlimited enforcement.

Keywords: AUCTIONS; UNCERTAINTY; BIDDING (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D44 D81 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 30 pages
Date: 1999
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-mic
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
http://rcer.econ.rochester.edu/RCERPAPERS/rcer_463.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:roc:rocher:463

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in RCER Working Papers from University of Rochester - Center for Economic Research (RCER) University of Rochester, Center for Economic Research, Department of Economics, Harkness 231 Rochester, New York 14627 U.S.A.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Richard DiSalvo ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).