Two families of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
No 535, RCER Working Papers from University of Rochester - Center for Economic Research (RCER)
We define two families of rules to adjudicate conflicting claims. The first family contains the constrained equal awards, constrained equal losses, Talmud, and minimal overlap rules. The second family, which also contains the constrained equal awards and constrained equal losses rules, is obtained from the first one by exchanging, for each problem, how well agents with relatively larger claims are treated as compared to agents with relatively smaller claims. In each case, we identify the subfamily of consistent rules.
Keywords: claims problems; constrained equal awards rule; constrained equal losses rule; Talmud rule; minimal overlap rule; ICI rules; CIC rules; consistency. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C79 D63 D74 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-gth
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://rcer.econ.rochester.edu/RCERPAPERS/rcer_535.pdf full text (application/pdf)
Journal Article: Two families of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims (2008)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:roc:rocher:535
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in RCER Working Papers from University of Rochester - Center for Economic Research (RCER) University of Rochester, Center for Economic Research, Department of Economics, Harkness 231 Rochester, New York 14627 U.S.A.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Richard DiSalvo ().