Family Violence and Football: The Effect of Unexpected Emotional Cues on Violent Behavior
David Card and
Gordon Dahl
No 546, RCER Working Papers from University of Rochester - Center for Economic Research (RCER)
Abstract:
Family violence is a pervasive and costly problem, yet there is no consensus on how to interpret the phenomenon of violence by one family member against another. Some analysts assume that violence has an instrumental role in intra-family incentives. Others argue that violent episodes represent a loss of control that the offender immediately regrets. In this paper we specify and test a behavioral model of the latter form in which the strength of an emotional cue depends on outcomes relative to expectations and individuals exhibit loss aversion. Our key hypothesis is that negative emotional cues -- benchmarked relative to a rationally expected reference point -- make a breakdown of control more likely. We test this hypothesis using data on police reports of family violence on Sundays during the professional football season. Controlling for location and time fixed effects, weather factors, the pre-game point spread, and the size of the local viewing audience, we find that upset losses by the home team (losses in games that the home team was predicted to win by more than 3 points) lead to an 8 percent increase in police reports of at-home male-on-female intimate partner violence. There is no corresponding effect on female-on-male violence. Consistent with the behavioral prediction that losses matter more than gains, upset victories by the home team have (at most) a small dampening effect on family violence. We also find that unexpected losses in highly salient or frustrating games have a 50% to 100% larger impact on rates of family violence. The evidence that payoff-irrelevant events affect the rate of family violence leads us to conclude that at least some fraction of family violence is better characterized as a breakdown of control than as an intra-family incentive system. More generally, the empirical findings suggest that gain-loss utility with a rational reference point could be a useful approach to modeling other cues and visceral influences.
Pages: 49 pages
Date: 2009-10
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ltv, nep-neu and nep-spo
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (13)
Downloads: (external link)
http://rcer.econ.rochester.edu/RCERPAPERS/rcer_546.pdf full text (application/pdf)
None
Related works:
Journal Article: Family Violence and Football: The Effect of Unexpected Emotional Cues on Violent Behavior (2011) 
Working Paper: Family Violence and Football: The Effect of Unexpected Emotional Cues on Violent Behavior (2010) 
Working Paper: Family Violence and Football: The Effect of Unexpected Emotional Cues on Violent Behavior (2009) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:roc:rocher:546
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in RCER Working Papers from University of Rochester - Center for Economic Research (RCER) University of Rochester, Center for Economic Research, Department of Economics, Harkness 231 Rochester, New York 14627 U.S.A.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Richard DiSalvo ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).