Measurement Without Theory: A Response to Bailey and Collins
Ananth Seshadri () and
Guillaume Vandenbroucke ()
No 561, RCER Working Papers from University of Rochester - Center for Economic Research (RCER)
Bailey and Collins (forth.) argue that Greenwood, Seshadri and Vandenbroucke (2005)'s hypothesis that the baby boom was partly due to a burst of productivity in the household sector is not supported by evidence. This conclusion is based upon regression results showing that appliance ownership is negatively correlated with fertility. They also argue that the Amish, who limit the use of modern technology, had a baby boom. First, it is demonstrated that a negative correlation between appliance ownership and fertility can arise naturally in Greenwood et al.'s model. Second, evidence is presented casting doubt upon the presumed technological phobia of the Amish.
Keywords: Amish; appliances; baby boom; Bailey and Collins; fertility; model laboratory; Monte Carlo simulations; regressions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 10 pages
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://rcer.econ.rochester.edu/RCERPAPERS/rcer_561.pdf full text (application/pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:roc:rocher:561
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in RCER Working Papers from University of Rochester - Center for Economic Research (RCER) University of Rochester, Center for Economic Research, Department of Economics, Harkness 231 Rochester, New York 14627 U.S.A.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Richard DiSalvo ().