Social security and subsidiarity
Pierre Pestieau () and
CREPP Working Papers from Centre de Recherche en Economie Publique et de la Population (CREPP) (Research Center on Public and Population Economics) HEC-Management School, University of Liège
In this paper we deal with the design of three social insurance schemes (old age social security, health insurance an child benefits) in a federal setting such as the Belgian one. We argue that these three programs need to be reformed to be more efficient and more equitable. In none of these cases regional decentralization would be the most important element of the reform. Yet, in all three cases, some inefficiencies can be removed by a careful design of the relative competencies of the regions and the federal state. An open discussion over these issues is urgently needed to avoid a stalemate in which the necessary reforms are blocked.
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rpp:wpaper:0904
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in CREPP Working Papers from Centre de Recherche en Economie Publique et de la Population (CREPP) (Research Center on Public and Population Economics) HEC-Management School, University of Liège Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Mathieu Lefebvre ().