Disentangling factors behind training partecipation in Italy
Giuseppe Croce () and
Massimiliano Tancioni ()
No 101, Working Papers from University of Rome La Sapienza, Department of Public Economics
This paper analyses the pattern of training participation in Italy. Employing a new survey conducted on a large sample of individuals, we develop a model of bilateral training choices. In order to distinguish between workers and employers choices, we estimate a structural bivariate probit model whose identification relies on some mild assumptions on sample selection. With this approach we attempt to overcome the informative limitations of training participation probability estimates referred to reduced form models. The training participation probability depends on individual, job-specific and firmâ€™s characteristics. Among the most relevant results, we find that females demand as much training as males and suffer from poorer chances of firm-provided training. Similarly, employees with a temporary contract are rationed even if their demand is in line with that of their permanent colleagues. Conversely, the lower participation of parttimers is explained by lower demand. A stance for more targeted training public policies is derived.
Keywords: training choices; identification; bivariate probit. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: J24 J08 C35 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sap:wpaper:wp101
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from University of Rome La Sapienza, Department of Public Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Luisa Giuriato ().