Is Deposit Insurance a Good Thing, and If So, Who Should Pay for It?
Alan Morrison () and
OFRC Working Papers Series from Oxford Financial Research Centre
Deposit insurance schemes are becoming increasingly popular around the world and yet there is little understanding of how they should be designed and what their consequences are. In this paper we provide a new rationale for the provision of deposit insurance. We analyse a model in which agents choose between depositing their funds with banks and placing them in a less productive self-managed project. Bankers have valuable but costly project management skills and the banking sector exhibits both adverse selection and moral hazard. Depositors do not fully account for the social benefits accruing from bank management of projects and so too few deposits are made in equilibrium. The regulator can correct this market failure by providing deposit insurance to encourage deposits. Contrary to received opinion, we find that deposit insurance should be funded not by bankers or depositors but through general taxation.
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ias
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found
Working Paper: Is Deposit Insurance A Good Thing, And If So, Who Should Pay for It? (2004)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sbs:wpsefe:2004fe08
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in OFRC Working Papers Series from Oxford Financial Research Centre Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Maxine Collett ().