SAMPLE SELECTION PROBLEMS IN A MACROECONOMETRIC MODEL CONTEXT -- SOME FURTHER RESULTS

György Barabas and Ullrich Heilemann
Additional contact information
Ullrich Heilemann: Rheinisch-Westflisches Institut fr Wirtschaftsforschung

No 141, Computing in Economics and Finance 2000 from Society for Computational Economics

Abstract: The selection of sample size and time period is vital to econometric modelling since both affect model behaviour and results. Despite this importance, the question has attracted little attention in the literature.In an earlier paper, we analysed the relationship between forecasting performance and sample length for the medium-sized macroeconometric RWI-business cycle model. The study was conducted primarily on the single-equation level examining 1-, 4-, and 8-quarter forecasts for each equation. The "moving-window" size ranged from 20 to 60 in steps of 10 quarters on the longest possible sets of data with the same specification for each sample and window. In general, the results did not reject the prevailing practice of basing estimations on a uniform window size, covering the last 40 quarters of the data base ("moving window"). Both shorter and longer window sizes had advantages for half of the equations, but the improvements in forecasting accuracy in these cases were not very impressive.This paper extends these earlier results by exploiting the information gained from them and by paying attention to the time profile. First, we relax the fixed specification through all samples for particular equations. The 20-quarter window seemed best for the Government sector, not surprisingly, since institutional changes (e.g., of the tax code) are frequent here. These changes are usually incorporated in the equations via dummies and, when forecasting, by add factoring. In capturing such information, the optimal window size will certainly change -- probably also providing interesting information about the effectiveness of the add factoring. Second, the time profile of the forecasts as well as of the quality of estimation of the model blocks is analysed. These may lead to some hints for general structural shifts in the economy.

Date: 2000-07-05
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sce:scecf0:141

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Computing in Economics and Finance 2000 from Society for Computational Economics CEF 2000, Departament d'Economia i Empresa, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Ramon Trias Fargas, 25,27, 08005, Barcelona, Spain. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().