LEARNING-INDUCED SECURITIES PRICE VOLATILITY

Peter Bossaerts ()

No 299, Computing in Economics and Finance 2000 from Society for Computational Economics

Abstract: This paper tests whether the high average returns on the S&P 500 index in recent history can be attributed to mistaken expectations (the ex-ante risk premium -- taken to be constant -- is systematically less than the ex-post measured risk premium), or, alternatively, whether can they be explained as the result of selection bias (the U.S. experience is exceptional). The tests reject these hypotheses over the periods 1/81 to 12/97 (p = 0.02), and 1/41-12/60 (p = 0.03). They do not reject over the periods 1/28-12/40 and 1/61-12/80. The tests are based on a bound that the ex-post Sharpe ratios impose on the volatility of the ratio of the market's prior and posterior beliefs about future outcomes. The bound derives from a property of Bayesian learning first noted in an earlier paper. Qualitatively, for the bound not to be violated, higher absolute mean excess returns may need to be accompanied with higher volatility. This should be interpreted as predicting that large price movements (positive as well as negative) may have to be erratic. We confirm this prediction for the S&P 500 data.

Date: 2000-07-05
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sce:scecf0:299

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Computing in Economics and Finance 2000 from Society for Computational Economics CEF 2000, Departament d'Economia i Empresa, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Ramon Trias Fargas, 25,27, 08005, Barcelona, Spain. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().