Økonomisk teorihistorie - Overflødig information eller brugbar ballast?

Finn Olesen

No 29/02, Working Papers from University of Southern Denmark, Department of Sociology, Environmental and Business Economics

Abstract: Ofte fremhæves det, at økonomi som fagdisciplin har vundet videnskabelig sta-tus og progressivitet gennem specialisering (fra generalist til partiel ekspert) og anvendelse af en naturvidenskabelig inspireret metodologisk approach. Med en sådan udviklingstendens har økonomer da også i dag brug for en viden om de-res fags historiske udvikling? Eller bør man med rette betragte økonomisk teo-rihistorie som et degenererende forskningsprogram, som man ikke bør spilde sin knappe arbejdskraftressource på?

Pages: 23 pages
Date: 2002-03
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sdu.dk/~/media/Files/Om_SDU/Institutter/Miljo/ime/wp/olese29.ashx First version, 2002-03 (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 500 Can't connect to www.sdu.dk:80 (A connection attempt failed because the connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or established connection failed because connected host has failed to respond.)

Related works:
Journal Article: Økonomisk teorihistorie – Overflødig information eller brugbar ballast? (2002)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sdk:wpaper:29

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from University of Southern Denmark, Department of Sociology, Environmental and Business Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Ulla H. Oehlenschläger (uho@sam.sdu.dk this e-mail address is bad, please contact repec@repec.org).