The Elusive Quest for Additionality
Nicolas Van de Sijpe,
Patrick Carter () and
Raphael Calel
No 2019022, Working Papers from The University of Sheffield, Department of Economics
Abstract:
Development finance institutions (DFIs) annually invest $90 billion to support under-financed projects across the world. Although these government-backed institutions are often asked to show that their investments are “additional” to what private investors would have financed, it is rarely clear what evidence is needed to answer this request. This paper demonstrates, through a series of simulations, that the nature of DFIs’ operations creates systematic biases in how a range of estimators assess additionality. Recognising that rigorous quantitative evidence of additionality may continue to elude us, we discuss the value of qualitative evidence, and propose a probabilistic approach to evaluating additionality.
Keywords: Development Finance Institutions; Investment; Additionality; Simulation. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F21 F35 G15 O16 O19 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 46 pages
Date: 2019-12
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-fdg
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/economics/research/serps First version, December 2019 (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: The elusive quest for additionality (2021)
Working Paper: The Elusive Quest for Additionality (2018)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:shf:wpaper:2019022
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from The University of Sheffield, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Mike Crabtree ().