Corporatism and Capital Accumulation: The Fate of the Social Corporatist Model
Jonathan Perraton
No 2022005, Working Papers from The University of Sheffield, Department of Economics
Abstract:
An extensive literature has examined whether corporatist national wage bargaining systems can deliver superior economic performance, but this has mostly focused on short run indicators. Such systems of industrial relations could provide incentives for investment if organized labour can credibly pre-commit to wage moderation. This paper examines this, building on monopoly union models that indicate the response of corporatist wage bargaining arrangements to investment. The paper estimates the response of wage bargaining to capital investment, conditional on outside options, in six key economies widely characterized as having sustained corporatist bargaining arrangements over 1970-2017. The econometric approach allows changes in regimes to be determined endogenously; these shifts appear consistent with wider evidence on changes in bargaining arrangements and financial integration of these economies.
Keywords: Social corporatism; Capital accumulation; Wage bargaining; Eichengreen hypothesis; Structural breaks (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E22 J31 J51 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 47 pages
Date: 2022-03
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-lma and nep-mac
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/economics/research/serps First version, March 2022 (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:shf:wpaper:2022005
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from The University of Sheffield, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Mike Crabtree ().