Re-evaluating China’s New Energy Demonstration Cities with two-way fixed effects: A comment
You Wu () and
Andrew Burlinson ()
Additional contact information
You Wu: School of Economics, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TU, UK
Andrew Burlinson: School of Economics, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TU, UK
No 2026002, Working Papers from The University of Sheffield, Department of Economics
Abstract:
China’s New Energy Demonstration City (NEDC) policy aims to address energy and environmental challenges. While two-way fixed effects (TWFE) regression is often used to evaluate such policies within difference-in-differences frameworks, it can lead to incorrect conclusions if unit and time effects are mis-specified. Re-evaluating the impact of the NEDC policy on energy poverty (EP), as studied in Ma et al. (2025), by correctly specifying unit-specific and time-specific effects, we find that: i) the parallel trends assumption fails, and ii) the previously reported impact on EP becomes economically and statistically insignificant. Whether NEDCs reduce EP therefore remains an open question.
Keywords: Policy evaluation; Two-way fixed effects regression; Difference-in-differences; Energy Poverty (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C12 C23 Q41 Q48 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 10 pages
Date: 2026-03
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cna, nep-ene and nep-env
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/economics/research/serps First version, March 2026 (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:shf:wpaper:2026002
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from The University of Sheffield, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Mike Crabtree ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).