Some Critical Episodes in the Progress of Medical Innovation: An Anglo-American Perspective

Nathan Rosenberg

No 08-008, Discussion Papers from Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research

Abstract: The central concern of this paper is to show that medical innovations have depended heavily on breaking down barriers that have long prevailed in the academic world, in the form of disciplinary boundaries that have coalesced into separate departments. In the longer run, this sharp distinction between Life Sciences and Physical Sciences may be the basis for excessively narrow and inappropriate policy recommendations. Some of the biggest breakthroughs in the Life Sciences came from the Physical Sciences.

Keywords: Life Sciences; Physical Sciences; Research; Medical Innovations; Policy Recommendations (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I23 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008-11
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www-siepr.stanford.edu/repec/sip/08-008.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 500 Can't connect to www-siepr.stanford.edu:80 (nodename nor servname provided, or not known)

Related works:
Chapter: Some Critical Episodes in the Progress of Medical Innovation: An Anglo-American Perspective (2009)
Journal Article: Some critical episodes in the progress of medical innovation: An Anglo-American perspective (2009)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sip:dpaper:08-008

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Discussion Papers from Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Anne Shor ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).