Low-Income Demand for Local Telephone Service: Effects of Lifeline and Linkup
Daniel Ackerberg (),
Gregory Rosston () and
Additional contact information
Gregory Rosston: Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research, Stanford University
Bradley Wimmer: Department of Economics, St. Lawrence University
No 08-047, Discussion Papers from Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research
This study evaluates the effect of the “Lifeline” and “Linkup” subsidy programs on telephone penetration rates of low-income households. It is the first to estimate low-income telephone demand across demographic groups using location-specific Lifeline and Linkup prices. The demand specifications use a discrete choice model aggregated across demographic groups. GMM estimators correct for the possible endogeneity of subsidized prices. A simulation predicts low-income telephone penetration would be 4.1 percentage points lower without Lifeline and Linkup. Results suggest that Linkup is more cost-effective than Lifeline, and that automatic enrollment in the programs increases penetration.
Keywords: telephone subsidies; low-income telephone usuers (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O30 H20 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009-08, Revised 2009-08
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Working Paper: Low-Income Demand for Local Telephone Service: Effects of Lifeline and Linkup (2008)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sip:dpaper:08-047
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Discussion Papers from Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Anne Shor (). This e-mail address is bad, please contact .