Investigating the Applicability of Contingency Leadership Theory in the South African National Defence Forces: A Comparative Study of Combat and Support Divisions

Tseliso Isaiah Ramoeletsi () and Harry Cameron ()
Additional contact information
Tseliso Isaiah Ramoeletsi: South African National Defence Forces, Pretoria, South Africa
Harry Cameron: Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, United Kingdom

RAIS Conference Proceedings 2022-2024 from Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies

Abstract: This study aimed to assist leaders in the South African National Defence Forces (SANDF) understand the contingency factors that influenced choice of leadership styles and help such leaders to select the appropriate leadership style(s) for enhancing leadership effectiveness. To do that, the study tested the applicability of the contingency leadership theory to the SANDF, identified the contingent leadership factors within the SANDF and recommended the appropriate leadership style. The study was based on a sample of randomly selected n=120 staff from one of SANDF’s unit, split equally between support and combat staff. Four instruments were administered, the Demographic instrument, the Task Work Instrument (WSI), the Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) instrument, the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES) and the Least Preferred Co-worker (LPC) instrument. Descriptive statistics, correlation, T-tests and regression analyses were used to analyse the data. T-test results showed that there were statistically significant differences between staff in support and combat staff in terms of task structure, work engagement and leader-member exchange. In addition, these three leadership contingent factors were found to significantly influence the choice of leadership within SANDF’s combat division. Within the support division, task structure was an insignificant factor in determining the influence of leadership style but work engagement and leader-member exchange were significant contributors to the choice of leadership style in that division. Therefore, the differences in these contingent factors point to the applicability of the contingent theory to SANDF. While the dominant leadership style in the combat division was relationship-oriented, a combination of relationship-oriented and task-oriented leadership styles was dominant in the support division. Training and development were proposed as a way of enhancing the adaptability of leaders in the SANDF, thereby improving their mobility across the two diverse divisions. Finally, the size of the sample, relative to the target population, choice of contingent factors and reliance on quantitative methodology, all presented some limitations. Recommendations for future research has been given in light of these limitations.

Keywords: Contingency Leadership Theory; Leadership Styles; Leadership Effectiveness; Leader-Member Exchange (LMX); Task Structure; Work Engagement; Leadership Training and Development (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 12 pages
Date: 2024-08
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Published in Proceedings of the 38th International RAIS Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities, November 21-22, 2024, pages 131-141

Downloads: (external link)
https://rais.education/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/0467.pdf Full text (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:smo:raiswp:0467

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in RAIS Conference Proceedings 2022-2024 from Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Eduard David ().