Banking and Transparency: Is More Information Always Better?
No 2009-11, Working Papers from Swiss National Bank
This paper shows that transparency in banking can be harmful from a social planner's point of view. According to our model, enhancing transparency above a certain level may lead to the inefficient liquidation of a bank. The reason lies in the nature of a standard deposit contract: its payoff scheme has limited upside gains (cap) but leaves the depositor with the downside risk. Accordingly, depositors will not take into account possible future upside gains of the bank when deciding whether or not to withdraw their deposits. Our result points towards a trade-off the regulator faces: while enhancing transparency may be useful to reduce incentives for excessive risk-taking (moral hazard), it may also increase the risk of inefficient bank runs.
Keywords: banking; transparency; financial stability; bank run (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D82 G21 G28 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.snb.ch/n/mmr/reference/working_paper_2 ... _paper_2009_11.n.pdf (application/pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:snb:snbwpa:2009-11
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Swiss National Bank Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Enzo Rossi ().