Limits to arbitrage during the crisis: funding liquidity constraints and covered interest parity
Tommaso Mancini Griffoli and
Angelo Ranaldo ()
No 2010-14, Working Papers from Swiss National Bank
Arbitrage normally ensures that covered interest parity (CIP) holds. Until recently, excess profits, if any, were documented to last merely seconds and reach a few pips. Instead, this paper finds that following the Lehman bankruptcy, these were large, persisted for months and involved strategies short in dollars. Profits are estimated by specifying the arbitrage strategy as a speculator would actually implement it, considering both unsecured and secured funding. Either way, it seems that dollar funding constraints kept traders from arbitraging away excess profits. The claim finds support in an empirical analysis drawing on several novel high frequency datasets of synchronous quotes across securities, including transaction costs.
Keywords: arbitrage limits; covered interest parity; funding liquidity; financial crisis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F31 G01 G14 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (17) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.snb.ch/n/mmr/reference/working_paper_2 ... _paper_2010_14.n.pdf (application/pdf)
Working Paper: Limits to Arbitrage during the Crisis: Finding Liquidity Constraints and Covered Interest Parity (2012)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:snb:snbwpa:2010-14
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Swiss National Bank Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Enzo Rossi ().