Stochastic Expected Utility and Prospect Theory in a Horse Race: A Finite Mixture Approach
Adrian Bruhin ()
No 803, SOI - Working Papers from Socioeconomic Institute - University of Zurich
This study compares the performance of Prospect Theory versus Stochastic Expected Utility Theory at fitting data on decision making under risk. Both theories incorporate well-known deviations from Expected Utility Maximization such as the Allais paradox or the fourfold pattern of risk attitudes. Stochastic Expected Utility Theory parsimoniously extends the standard microeconomic model, whereas Prospect Theory, the benchmark for aggregate choice so far, is based on psychological findings. First, the two theories' fit to representative choice is assessed for two experimental data sets, one Swiss and one Chinese. In a second step, finite mixture regressions reveal a consistent mix of two different behavioral types suggesting that researchers may take individual heterogeneity into account in order to avoid aggregation bias.
Keywords: stochastic expected etility theory; prospect theory; finite mixture models (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C49 D81 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 25 pages
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dcm, nep-exp and nep-upt
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.econ.uzh.ch/static/wp_soi/wp0803.pdf First version, 2008 (application/pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:soz:wpaper:0803
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in SOI - Working Papers from Socioeconomic Institute - University of Zurich Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Marita Kieser ().