To Bat or Not to Bat: An Examination of Contest Rules in Day-night Limited Overs Cricket
Peter Dawson (),
Bruce Morley (),
David Paton () and
Dennis Thomas ()
Additional contact information
Dennis Thomas: School of Management and Business, University of Wales Aberystwyth
No 801, Working Papers from International Association of Sports Economists, North American Association of Sports Economists
The tradition of tossing a coin to decide who bats first in a cricket match introduces a randomly-assigned advantage to one team that is unique in sporting contests. In this paper we develop previous work on this issue by examining the impact of the toss on outcomes of day-night one day international games explicitly allowing for relative team quality. We estimate conditional logit models of outcomes using data from day-night internationals played between 1979 and 2005. Other things equal, we find that winning the toss and batting increases the probability of winning by 31%. In contrast, winning the toss does not appear to confer any advantage if the team choose to bowl first.
Keywords: cricket; contest rules; match results; competitive balance; outcome uncertainty (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: L83 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-lab and nep-spo
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spe:wpaper:0801
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from International Association of Sports Economists Contact information at EDIRC., North American Association of Sports Economists Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Victor Matheson ().