TV Revenue Sharing as a Coordination Device in Sports Leagues
Thomas Peeters
No 1109, Working Papers from International Association of Sports Economists, North American Association of Sports Economists
Abstract:
As sports clubs jointly produce contests, they cannot determine contest quality through their private talent investments. Sports leagues therefore try to coordinate talent investments towards the profit-maximizing contest quality. In this paper I analyze how revenue sharing mechanisms may serve this goal when demand comes from hard-core club and neutral sports fans. Performance-based sharing turns out to be an inefficient sharing rule for the cartel, although it is not harmful for social welfare. This inefficient cartel behavior can be rationalized as the result of bargaining with asymmetric outside options. Data from US and European sports leagues illustrate the theoretical findings.
Keywords: cartel behavior; revenue sharing; sports leagues; TV rights (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: L41 L83 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 29 pages
Date: 2011-03
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-com and nep-spo
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://college.holycross.edu/RePEc/spe/Peeters_TVRevenueSharing.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: Media revenue sharing as a coordination device in sports leagues (2012) 
Working Paper: TV revenue sharing as a coordination device in sports (2010) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spe:wpaper:1109
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from International Association of Sports Economists Contact information at EDIRC., North American Association of Sports Economists Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Victor Matheson ().