EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Peer Review and the Relevance of Science

Alister Scott ()
Additional contact information
Alister Scott: SPRU, University of Sussex, http://www.sussex.ac.uk/spru/profile15199.html

No 145, SPRU Working Paper Series from SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School

Abstract: Recent science-policy debates have emphasised a growing role for science in helping to address some of society's most pressing challenges such as global environmental change, caring for the needs of ageing populations, and competitiveness in a global age. Other 'relevance' pressures include drives for public accountability, pressure for the 'democratisation' of science and demands from industry for usable knowledge. Underlying the question of the social relevance of science is the matter of decision-making and quality control in science, usually via the peer-review process. Peer review plays a central role in many of the key moments in science. It is the main form of decision-making around grant selection, academic publishing and the promotion of individual scientists within universities and research institutions. It also underpins methods used to evaluate scientific institutions. Yet peer review as currently practised can be narrowly scientific, to the exclusion of other pressing quality criteria relating to social relevance. It is often also controlled and practised by scientists to the exclusion of wider groups that might bring valuable perspectives. This article sets out to examine peer review through the lens of social relevance. It challenges peer review as currently practised and makes some suggestions for ways forward.

Keywords: science policy; relevance of science; social relevance; peer review; quality control (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I0 O3 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 34 pages
Date: 2006-04-11
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ino and nep-sog
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sussex.ac.uk/spru/documents/sewp_145.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found (http://www.sussex.ac.uk/spru/documents/sewp_145.pdf [302 Found]--> https://www.sussex.ac.uk/webteam/gateway/file.php?name=sewp_145.pdf&site=25)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sru:ssewps:145

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in SPRU Working Paper Series from SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by University of Sussex Business School Communications Team ().

 
Page updated 2025-04-11
Handle: RePEc:sru:ssewps:145