Sufficient Welfare Indicators Allowing Disagreement in Evaluations of Social Welfare
Kjell Arne Brekke,
Hilde Lurås and
Karine Nyborg
Discussion Papers from Statistics Norway, Research Department
Abstract:
There is no consensus on how to measure interpersonally comparable, cardinal utility. Despite of this, people repeatedly make welfare evaluations in their everyday lives. However, people do not always agree on such evaluations, and this is one important reason for political disagreements. Thus, to keep in control of the normative premises, decision makers may prefer information which can be used as input in an arbitrary social welfare function to information which is the output from a social welfare function specified by the analyst. In this paper we try to identify sufficient welfare indicators; information which enable decision makers to arrive at welfare evaluations of social states or projects, according to their own ethical beliefs. Our conclusion is that providing factual information about different population groups; their social state, size, and characteristics, may be better for this purpose than the more traditional approach of focusing on ordinal utility information.
Keywords: Disagreement; interpersonal comparison; social welfare. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A11 A13 D6 D7 I31 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1994-06
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.ssb.no/a/publikasjoner/pdf/DP/dp_119.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ssb:dispap:119
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Discussion Papers from Statistics Norway, Research Department P.O.Box 8131 Dep, N-0033 Oslo, Norway. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by L Maasø ().