Project Evaluations and Decision Processes

Karine Nyborg

Discussion Papers from Statistics Norway, Research Department

Abstract: Cost-benefit analysis have been attacked by many critics because of its implicit ethical assumptions. The normative content of the method is at odds with the common attitude that economists should analyze how to reach given goals, while determination of the goals should be left to the politicians. This paper presents a descriptive model of decision makers' behavior, demonstrating that rational, benevolent politicians will only in special cases accept the evaluation of projects resulting from a cost-benefit analysis. An alternative approach to project evaluation, which allows individual decision makers to rank projects in accordance with their own ethical views, is presented. In this framework, estimates of willingness to pay are generally not required. On the other hand, information about groups that are significantly affected by the project, as well as physical unit information on changes in the supply of public goods, is crucial.

Keywords: Cost-benefit analysis; welfare judgements; information constraint. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A11 D61 D78 D83 H43 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1995-02
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.ssb.no/a/publikasjoner/pdf/DP/dp_137.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ssb:dispap:137

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Discussion Papers from Statistics Norway, Research Department P.O.Box 8131 Dep, N-0033 Oslo, Norway. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by L Maasø ().