Reconsidering the theory on adolescent-limited and life-course persistent antisocial behaviour

Torbjørn Skardhamar

Discussion Papers from Statistics Norway, Research Department

Abstract: This article presents a critical review of the taxonomic theory of adolescent-limited and life-course persistent antisocial behaviour (Moffitt 1993) and its empirical evidence. This influential theory suggests that there are two qualitatively distinct types of offenders that require distinct theoretical explanations. Moreover, the empirical evidence for the typology is considered to be strong, at least by some. I discuss along three lines. First, to what extent the taxonomy should be interpreted literally. Second, whether the suggested mechanisms are likely to produce the hypothesized groups. Third, whether some of the most important empirical evidence really does support the theory. I conclude that the theoretical arguments are surprisingly unclear on key issues and that the empirical evidence is highly problematic.

Keywords: criminal careers; life-course persistent offenders; general theories; taxonomic theory (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: J1 Z00 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009-05
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.ssb.no/a/publikasjoner/pdf/DP/dp587.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ssb:dispap:587

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Discussion Papers from Statistics Norway, Research Department P.O.Box 8131 Dep, N-0033 Oslo, Norway. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by L Maasø ().