Monitoring and enforcement of environmental regulations. Lessons from a natural field experiment in Norway

Kjetil Telle

Discussion Papers from Statistics Norway, Research Department

Abstract: Relying on a small natural field experiment with random assignment of treatments, I estimate effects of three core elements of most monitoring and enforcement practices: self-reporting, audit frequency and specific deterrence. I find evidence of evasive reporting of violations in self-audits, as more violations are detected in on-site audits than in self-audits. Announcing the increased audit frequency has no effect on compliance, but an audit raises the firm's subsequent compliance substantially.

Keywords: environmental regulation; enforcement; EPA; natural field experiment; random assignment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C93 D21 H41 K42 Q58 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012-02
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-env, nep-exp, nep-law, nep-reg and nep-res
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.ssb.no/a/publikasjoner/pdf/DP/dp680.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ssb:dispap:680

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Discussion Papers from Statistics Norway, Research Department P.O.Box 8131 Dep, N-0033 Oslo, Norway. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by L Maasø ().