EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

What a difference a stochastic process makes: epidemiological-based real options models of optimal treatment of disease

C.E. Dangerfield, A.E. Whalley, Nick Hanley and C.A. Gilligan
Additional contact information
C.E. Dangerfield: Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge
A.E. Whalley: Warwick Business School, The University of Warwick
C.A. Gilligan: Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge

Discussion Papers in Environment and Development Economics from University of St. Andrews, School of Geography and Sustainable Development

Abstract: The real options approach has been used within environmental economics to investigate the impact of uncertainty on the optimal timing of control measures to minimise the impacts of disease. Previous studies typically model the growth in infected area using geometric Brownian motion. The advantage of this is that it is simple and allows for closed form solutions. However, such a process is unbounded and so does not respect the natural upper boundary of the system which is determined by the maximum size of the host species. We show how the natural upper boundary can be incorporated endogenously into the decision problem, through the formulation of the stochastic process that describes growth in infected area. We find that ignoring the natural upper boundary of the system overestimates the value of the option to control, leading to delayed application of treatment. Indeed, when uncertainty is high or the disease is fast spreading then ignoring the upper boundary can lead to control never being deployed. Thus the results presented here have important implications for the way in which the real options approach is applied to determine optimal timing of disease control given uncertainty in future disease progression.

Keywords: invasive species; pests and diseases; uncertainty; irreversibility; real options, forests (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G11 Q01 Q18 Q23 Q54 Q57 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 32 pages
Date: 2016-03
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/media/dept-of-geograph ... rfield%20et%20al.pdf
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found (http://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/media/dept-of-geography-and-sustainable-development/pdf-s/DP%202016-03%20Dangerfield%20et%20al.pdf [302 Found]--> https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/media/dept-of-geography-and-sustainable-development/pdf-s/DP%202016-03%20Dangerfield%20et%20al.pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: What a Difference a Stochastic Process Makes: Epidemiological-Based Real Options Models of Optimal Treatment of Disease (2018) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sss:wpaper:2016-03

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Discussion Papers in Environment and Development Economics from University of St. Andrews, School of Geography and Sustainable Development Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Laure Kuhfuss ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).

 
Page updated 2025-03-31
Handle: RePEc:sss:wpaper:2016-03