Explaining variations in spending levels between local authorities: an economic analysis
David King ()
No 2008-29, Stirling Economics Discussion Papers from University of Stirling, Division of Economics
This paper puts forward and tests a simple model of how the median voter in a local authority (LA) may determine the level of its expenditure in relation to its needs, to see what lessons may be learned. For Scottish LAs, variations in spending in relation to need are very small, but the model explains these variations well; it also suggests that the Scottish National Party leads to the lowest spending levels, and that the island LAs receive over-generous needs allowances. For England, the model explains variations in service levels very well for LAs with relatively low spending but very poorly for LAs with relatively high spending: this suggests that the latter are prevented by capping from providing the high service levels that their median voters want. Also, it is found that among underspenders, increased efficiency reduces spending. Finally, no evidence was found to suggest that the 2002 downward revisions in the relative spending needs of the English shire counties were inappropriate.
Keywords: Local authority spending; Overspending; Tax capping; Tax price; Value for money (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ure
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:stl:stledp:2008-29
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Stirling Economics Discussion Papers from University of Stirling, Division of Economics Division of Economics, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland FK9 4LA. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Liam Delaney ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).