EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Accessing sovereign markets - the recent experiences of Ireland, Portugal, Spain, and Cyprus

Rolf Strauch, Juan Rojas, Frank O'Connor, Cristina Casalinho, Pablo de Ramón-Laca Clausen and Phaedon Kalozois
Additional contact information
Rolf Strauch: European Stability Mechanism
Frank O'Connor: NTMA - Ireland
Cristina Casalinho: IGCP - Portugal
Pablo de Ramón-Laca Clausen: Tesoro - Spain
Phaedon Kalozois: PDMO - Cyprus

Discussion Papers from European Stability Mechanism

Abstract: A defining feature of the euro crisis, which we experienced over the past few years, is that market access broke down for some countries or was impaired. Some countries could not find sufficient investors to cover their needs or could not do so entirely at a sustainable cost. In the past crisis, this happened to Greece, Ireland, Portugal, Spain, and Cyprus. This discussion paper collects the experiences of several of these euro area countries as they developed strategies to regain access to affordable financial market financing. Euro area governments created a crisis resolution framework that included the European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF), and European Stability Mechanism (ESM), to help countries regain market access. Governments undergo adjustment programmes or undertake measures to repair the banking sector – that is, to “bring their house in order” and regain investors’ trust. For the programme period, a country’s financing gap is covered by the EFSF/ESM. During this period, DMOs managed to keep to different degrees some limited market financing and importantly had to launch a strategy to regain full market access. By now, four of the five countries that underwent an EFSF or ESM programme have successfully exited. The objective of this discussion paper is to document the steps which DMOs in Ireland, Portugal, Spain, and Cyprus took to structure their financing during the programme period, where possible, and the strategy they launched in approaching domestic and international bond markets. Approaches to regaining market access in Ireland, Portugal, and Cyprus show similar phases. It starts with a renewed ramping up of communication and investor contacts, opportunistic issuances and then more broad-based bill and bond issuance. Spain maintained broader market access over the programme period and therefore deviates in this respect. However, interestingly, all countries embarked on some innovation in their investor relations, products or issuance technologies, when comparing the pre- and post-programme period. The differences reflect both each country’s specific market conditions and common factors. An important commonality seems to be the reliance on a sizeable cash buffer as an assurance for investors if a country re-enters markets at a sub-investment grade rating. Market access strategies are not deployed in isolation, but their success hinges on domestic and European policies. First, firm and credible programme implementation is a key condition for gaining investors’ trust and successfully accessing markets. Second, the EFSF and ESM terms of lending at concessional rates and very long maturities facilitate private sector engage-ment in the programme and post-programme period. Third, monetary policy crucially determines market conditions. The impact of low interest rates and the European Central Bank’s quantitative easing programme can hardly be over-emphasised in explaining investor demand and yields for former pro-gramme countries. The DMOs from Ireland, Portugal, Spain, and Cyprus for contribute their experiences to this paper. They explain and put in context their strategies to regaining full market access. Presenting the DMOs’ account on market access of former programme countries fills a gap in the narrative of the country experiences through the crisis. It also offers lessons to better understand market reactions and DMOs’ capabilities which may be helpful in the future.

Pages: 42
Date: 2016-06-20, Revised 2016-12-13
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-eec
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://esm.europa.eu/sites/default/files/document ... ion_paper2_final.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found (https://esm.europa.eu/sites/default/files/document/esm_discussion_paper2_final.pdf [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.esm.europa.eu/sites/default/files/document/esm_discussion_paper2_final.pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:stm:dpaper:2

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Discussion Papers from European Stability Mechanism Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Karol SISKIND (k.siskind@esm.europa.eu).

 
Page updated 2025-04-01
Handle: RePEc:stm:dpaper:2