Economic Geometry: Marshalls and Other Early Representations of Demand and Supply

Roy Grieve ()

No 806, Working Papers from University of Strathclyde Business School, Department of Economics

Abstract: Does an apparent (minor) anomaly, said to occur not infrequently in elementary expositions of supply and demand theory, really imply – as seems to be suggested – that there is something a bit odd about Marshall’s diagrammatic handling of demand and supply? On investigation, we find some interesting differences of focus and exposition amongst the theorists who first developed the ‘geometric’ treatment of demand and supply, but find no reason, despite his differences from other marginalist pioneers such as Cournot, Dupuit and Walras, to consider Marshall’s treatment either as unconventional or forced, or as to regard him as the ‘odd man out’.

Keywords: Marshall; Marginalist Pioneers; Diagrammatic Conventions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: B13 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 28 pages
Date: 2008-04
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-hpe
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.strath.ac.uk/media/1newwebsite/departme ... /media_113041_en.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:str:wpaper:0806

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from University of Strathclyde Business School, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kirsty Hall ().