The long-run effects of peers on mental health
Lukas Kiessling () and
Jonathan Norris ()
Additional contact information
Jonathan Norris: Department of Economics, University of Strathclyde
No 2006, Working Papers from University of Strathclyde Business School, Department of Economics
This paper studies how peers in school affect studentsâ€™ mental health. Guided by a theoretical framework, we find that increasing studentsâ€™ relative ranks in their cohorts by one standard deviation improves their mental health by 6% of a standard deviation conditional on own ability. These effects are more pronounced for low-ability students, persistent for at least 14 years, and carry over to economic long-run outcomes. Moreover, we document a strong asymmetry: Students who receive negative rather than positive shocks react more strongly. Our findings therefore provide evidence on how the school environment can have long-lasting consequences for the well-being of individuals.
Keywords: Peer Effects; Mental Health; Depression; Rank Effects (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I21 I14 J24 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 70 pages
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ure
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.strath.ac.uk/media/1newwebsite/departm ... _Lukas_Kiessling.pdf (application/pdf)
Working Paper: The Long-Run Effects of Peers on Mental Health (2020)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:str:wpaper:2006
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from University of Strathclyde Business School, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kirsty Hall ().