Liability, insurance and defensive medicine: new evidence
Paul Fenn,
Alastair Gray and
Neil Rickman
No 304, School of Economics Discussion Papers from School of Economics, University of Surrey
Abstract:
For the first time, we test for effects of liability on hospital care using measures of current perceptions of litigation risk at hospital level; in particular, the risk-sharing arrangements agreed between hospitals and their insurers. GMM and ML estimators are used to allow for possible endogeneity of risksharing arrangements. Our findings are consistent with the exercise of liabilityinduced discretion by hospitals, especially regarding use of costly diagnostic imaging. Hospitals facing higher expected litigation costs also use these tests more frequently, after controlling for activity levels, casemix and treatment outcome; the latter indicating that defensive medicine may be present. We also find evidence of fewer new claims against these hospitals, given adverse events, which may indicate the increased use of claims management processes by hospital managers concerned at the expected cost of litigation.
Keywords: Medical malpractice; defensive care; insurance; litigation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I18 K13 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 40 pages
Date: 2004-07
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ias and nep-law
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://repec.som.surrey.ac.uk/2004/DP03-04.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sur:surrec:0304
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in School of Economics Discussion Papers from School of Economics, University of Surrey Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Ioannis Lazopoulos ().