EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Bargaining with a Residual Claimant: An Experimental Study

Matthew Embrey, Kyle Hyndman and Arno Riedl

Working Paper Series from Department of Economics, University of Sussex Business School

Abstract: Most negotiations involve risks that are only resolved ex-post and often these risks are not incurred equally by the parties involved. We experimentally investigate bargaining situations where a residual claimant is exposed to ex-post risk, whereas a fixedpayoff player is not. We find that residual claimants extract a risk premium, which increases in risk exposure and that this premium is sometimes high enough to make it beneficial to bargain over a risky rather than a risk-less pie. In contrast to predictions of a benchmark model, it is the comparatively less risk averse residual claimants who benefit the most and this is driven by fixed-payoff player's adoption of weak bargaining strategies when the pie is risky. It is also the less risk averse who, when given the choice, choose to bargain over a riskier distribution. We also show that as risk increases, conflict about what constitutes a fair compensation for risk exposure is enhanced, which increases bargaining frictions.

Keywords: Bargaining; Ex-post Risk; Reference Points (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C71 C92 D81 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019-02
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-gth
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.sussex.ac.uk/webteam/gateway/file.php?name=wps-04-2019.pdf&site=24 (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Bargaining with a residual claimant: An experimental study (2021) Downloads
Working Paper: Bargaining with a Residual Claimant: An Experimental Study (2020) Downloads
Working Paper: Bargaining with a Residual Claimant: An Experimental Study (2014) Downloads
Working Paper: Bargaining with a residual claimant: An experimental study (2014) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sus:susewp:0419

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Paper Series from Department of Economics, University of Sussex Business School Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by University of Sussex Business School Communications Team ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-31
Handle: RePEc:sus:susewp:0419