Choices and constraints over retirement income streams: comparing rules and regulations
Hazel Bateman () and
Susan Thorp
No 2007-29, Discussion Papers from School of Economics, The University of New South Wales
Abstract:
The new Simplified Superannuation regulations for Australian superannuation provide tax concessions to retirement income streams which comply with legislated minimum drawdown rules. We evaluate these new drawdown rules against four alternatives, including three formula-based ‘rules of thumb’ and the previous legislated minimum drawdown limits for allocated pensions. We find that the new regulations are a substantial improvement on the previous rules for allocated pensions and, when compared with the four formula-based rules, are a good compromise in terms of simplicity, a dequacy and risk. We also find that welfare is lower for most individuals who follow the Simplified Superannuation compared with welfare under an optimal path or a simple fixed percentage drawdown rule, but that outcomes could be improved through a further simplification of the rules.
Pages: 39 pages
Date: 2007-08
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://wwwdocs.fce.unsw.edu.au/economics/Research/WorkingPapers/2007_29.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: Choices and Constraints over Retirement Income Streams: Comparing Rules and Regulations (2008) 
Working Paper: Choices and Constraints over Retirement Income Streams: Comparing Rules and Regulations (2007) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:swe:wpaper:2007-29
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Discussion Papers from School of Economics, The University of New South Wales Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Hongyi Li ().