Quasi-exponential discounting*

Stephen Cheung, Kieran MacGibbon, Arquette Milin-Byrne and Agnieszka Tymula

No 2024-16, Working Papers from University of Sydney, School of Economics

Abstract: Alternatives to the standard model of time preference typically relax the assumption of an exponential discount function while retaining the framework of discounted utility. We report novel behavioural data inconsistent with this approach. Illustrating this claim, we estimate highly significant quasi-hyperbolic “present bias” (β = 0.833, smaller than 1 with p < 0.0001), despite our data exhibiting stationarity. The puzzle is resolved by relaxing discounted utility itself to allow discounting to be context dependent. We propose quasi-exponential discounting (QED) – a fixed penalty applied to all instances of delay, not only ones that begin in the present – as a particularly simple member of this class of models. This provides an excellent approximation to the best-fitting models, while retaining the analytical simplicity and ease of interpretation that have made exponential and quasi-hyperbolic discounting attractive in economic theory.

Keywords: time preference; present bias; stationarity; relative discounting. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024-07
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-upt
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://econ-wpseries.com/2024/202416.pdf

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:syd:wpaper:2024-16

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from University of Sydney, School of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Vanessa Holcombe ().