Moral rhetoric in the face of strategic weakness: modern clues for an ancient puzzle

Yanis Varoufakis

No 211, Working Papers from University of Sydney, School of Economics

Abstract: Moralising is a venerable last resort strategy. The ancient Melians presented the Athenians generals with a splendid example when in a particularly tight corner. In our Western philosophical tradition moral rhetoric is often couched in the form of reasons for action either external to preference and desire (eg. Kant) or internal to the agent's calculus of desire (eg. Hume, Gauthier). A third tradition dismisses such rhetoric as the last recourse of the weak (eg. Aristotle, Nietzsche) whereas a fourth calls for an extermination of the social context (eg. Socrates, Marx, Wittgenstein, Habermas). This paper reports on an experiment which throws some empirical light on these debates and which offers a surprising twist to the interpretation of the Melian's plea.

Date: 1994-11
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/2123/7407

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:syd:wpaper:2123/7407

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from University of Sydney, School of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Vanessa Holcombe ().