Industrial Specialisation and Public Procurement: Theory and Empirical Evidence
Marius Brülhart and
Economics Technical Papers from Trinity College Dublin, Economics Department
This paper explores the impact of home-biased public procurement on the location of industries. It is shown theoretically and empirically that discriminatory procurement can offset other locational determinants. In the theoretical part, we demonstrate that a bias in public procurement towards domestically produced goods can counter agglomeration forces substantially. The empirical analysis draws on a cross-country, cross-industry data sample for the EU. In the full sample, the market-based determinants of industry location identified in the theory are significant in explaining EU industrial specialisation. However, these determinants lose statistical significance in the sub-sample of procurement-sensitive industries. In this sub-sample, proxies for the degree of liberalisation of public procurement relate positively to specialisation.
JEL-codes: F12 F15 H57 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9) Track citations by RSS feed
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Journal Article: Industrial Specialisation and Public Procurement: Theory and Empirical Evidence (2001)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tcd:tcduet:983
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Economics Technical Papers from Trinity College Dublin, Economics Department Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Colette Angelov ().