Measuring Inequality: On the Correlation of Indices

Paolo Figini

Economics Technical Papers from Trinity College Dublin, Economics Department

Abstract: The preliminary step in assessing the extent of inequality is to decide how to measure it. Different indices exist, each responding to a built-in "aversion to inequality", and the choice of the index to be used affects conclusions. Whilst there is not a "preferable" index, the family of General Entropy Measures presents some beneficial properties. Yet, indices belonging to this family are not ordinally equivalent when Lorenz curves intersect. Therefore, conclusions about the extent and the change in inequality are driven by the assumptions behind the index chosen. Although the ranking correlation between inequality indices, empirically tested, is very high, a distinction should be drawn between cases involving non-intersecting and intersecting Lorenz curves. In the latter case, the choice of the index is fundamental to assess the distributional change. Therefore, a composite analysis of inequality through a series of indices, each sensitive to different parts of the distribution, is always preferable because it gives more details on the type of inequality and where it is more concentrated.

JEL-codes: D31 D63 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1998
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tcd:tcduet:987

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Economics Technical Papers from Trinity College Dublin, Economics Department Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Colette Angelov ().