Stock-Market Expectations: Econometric Evidence that both REH and Behavioral Insights Matter
Roman Frydman () and
Josh Stillwagon ()
Additional contact information
Roman Frydman: New York University
No 44, Working Papers Series from Institute for New Economic Thinking
Behavioral finance views stock-market investorsâ€™ expectations as largely unrelated to fundamental factors. Relying on survey data, this paper presents econometric evidence that fundamentals are a major driver of investorsâ€™ expectations. Although expectations are also in part extrapolative, this effect is transient. The paperâ€™s approach underscores the central importance of opening models to structural change and imposing discipline on econometric analysis through specification testing. Our findings support the novel hypothesis that rational market participants, faced with unforeseeable change, base their forecasts on both fundamentals - the focus of the REH approach - and the psychological and technical considerations underlying behavioral finance.
Keywords: Behavioral finance; REH; Knightian uncertainty; survey expectations; structural change; model specification; automated model selection. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G12 G14 G02 C22 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-fmk and nep-net
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://ineteconomics.org/uploads/papers/WP_44-Frydman-and-Stillwagon.pdf First version, 2016 (application/pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:thk:wpaper:44
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers Series from Institute for New Economic Thinking Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Pia Malaney ().