Economics at your fingertips  

The Perils of Antitrust Econometrics: Unrealistic Engel Curves, Inadequate Data, and Aggregation Bias

Gabriel Lozada ()
Additional contact information
Gabriel Lozada: University of Utah

No inetwp203, Working Papers Series from Institute for New Economic Thinking

Abstract: Some economists argue antitrust policy should be based on empirical methods used by the Industrial Organization subdiscipline of economics, but non-economists must understand that those methods contain certain highly restrictive assumptions. Those assumptions involve econometric "identification," and treating aggregate demand as if it were generated by a representative consumer (Muellbauer's "generalized linear" preferences). We derive new results illustrating how restrictive the representative consumer assumption is; we explain aggregation bias in Almost Ideal Demand System models; and we show that data limitations make it even harder to justify economists' restricting aggregate demands as one would the demand of a single individual.

Keywords: Antitrust econometrics; Almost Ideal Demand System (AIDS); New Brandeis School (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C43 C54 D12 L4 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 30 pages
Date: 2023-03-29
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-com, nep-hpe and nep-reg
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc


Downloads: (external link) (application/pdf) First version, 2022 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link:

DOI: 10.36687/inetwp203

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers Series from Institute for New Economic Thinking Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Pia Malaney ().

Page updated 2024-05-18
Handle: RePEc:thk:wpaper:inetwp203