Liberalising Gambling Markets: Lessons from Network Industries?
Eric van Damme
No 2007-025, Discussion Paper from Tilburg University, Tilburg Law and Economic Center
This paper, based on my concluding remarks at the “Colloquium on the Economic Aspects of Gambling Regulation: EU and US Perspectives” held at Tilburg in November 2006, discusses the question why, in Europe, some service sectors (such as network industries) are liberalised, while others (like the gambling sector) are not. In both, the discussion appears to be one-sided. In the former, the focus is on consumer benefits, where in the latter, only the possible consumer harm associated with liberalisation is discussed. A proper balancing of costs and benefits can, and should, be subsumed under the ECJ’s proportionality test, as formulated in Gambelli. If this more economic approach is taken, the result might very well be less restrictive policy towards gambling and games of chance.
Keywords: Gambling; market liberalisation; EU internal market (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: L51 L83 L88 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tiu:tiutil:05e5f2b8-a1b5-4638-9827-2e7e38a80802
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Discussion Paper from Tilburg University, Tilburg Law and Economic Center
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Richard Broekman ().