 "Traditional Institutionalism in Labor Studies: Is It Still Useful in the New Century?"(in Japanese)Kazuro Saguchi
No CIRJE-J-192, CIRJE J-Series from CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo Abstract: It is often said that Japanese traditional institutionalism in labor studies(JTILS) isn't necessarily useful for analyzing current problems, like inequality and poverty among workers. This kind of obsoleteness in JTILS is caused by two blind sides: inattention to the renewal of the theory about institution and the breaking off the relation with welfare studies. In order to conquer this weakness, the theory about institution of employment and its evolution in the 20th century is reconsidered, and besides, the ground for nexus of employment and welfare is shown in this paper. On the basis of this reconsideration, I discuss three problems which Japanese workers are currently confronted with and provide four hypothetical propositions: (1)Institution of employment itself is still robust in the 21st century. (2)Employment system of the last century is changing, and can be transformed flexibly. (3)The new employment system will not be legitimated without overcoming the negative side to the old employment system. (4)For JTILS, the cooperation with welfare studies is indispensable to analyze current labor problems. Lastly, I briefly address some research agenda. Pages: 23 pages There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it. Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tky:jseres:2008cj192 Access Statistics for this paper More papers in CIRJE J-Series from CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo Contact information at EDIRC. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.