Measuring the Cost of Economic Fluctuations with Preferences that Rationalize the Equity Premium
Angelo Melino ()
Working Papers from University of Toronto, Department of Economics
Lucas (2003) argues that the potential welfare gains from stabilizing the business cycle are small. In fact, he shows that the benefits of eliminating all economic fluctuations are small, both in an absolute sense and when compared to the potential gains from other reforms. His estimates are obtained using standard preferences. In this paper, I show that a model consistent with observed data on asset returns leads to very different conclusions. Calibrating preferences to observed asset market data raises the estimated welfare gains from completely eliminating aggregate fluctuations by approximately two orders of magnitude. Most of the gains, however, come from the elimination of low frequency contributions.
Keywords: welfare cost; fluctuations; stabilization (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E32 E61 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dge, nep-mac and nep-upt
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.economics.utoronto.ca/public/workingPapers/tecipa-256-1.pdf Main Text (application/pdf)
Journal Article: Measuring the cost of economic fluctuations with preferences that rationalize the equity premium (2010)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tor:tecipa:tecipa-256
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from University of Toronto, Department of Economics 150 St. George Street, Toronto, Ontario.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by RePEc Maintainer ().