Influenza Immunization Campaigns: Is an Ounce of Prevention Worth a Pound of Cure?

Courtney Ward ()

Working Papers from University of Toronto, Department of Economics

Abstract: This study provides causal evidence on the health and economic consequences of a broad-scope vaccination program. The Ontario Influenza Immunization Campaign (introduced in 2001) expanded the scope of vaccine coverage to the full population. By using the timing of this campaign and exogenous variation in vaccine quality, I am able to causally link higher vaccination rates to decreases in lost work-time, hospitalization, and death. Results indicate that, when vaccine quality is high, the campaign resulted in higher gains for Ontario relative to other provinces and in short, an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. Results also suggest significant positive health externalities for the elderly.

Keywords: Influenza; Immunization; Health; Work Absence; Respiratory Illness; Hospital Admission (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I1 J22 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 49 pages
Date: 2010-03-16
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.economics.utoronto.ca/public/workingPapers/tecipa-396.pdf Main Text (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Influenza Immunization Campaigns: Is an Ounce of Prevention Worth a Pound of Cure? (2009)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tor:tecipa:tecipa-396

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from University of Toronto, Department of Economics 150 St. George Street, Toronto, Ontario.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by RePEc Maintainer ().