Measuring "Long and Healthy Lives": Healthier Lives Longer Lives?
Gordon Anderson and
Working Papers from University of Toronto, Department of Economics
On the presumption that a healthier life means a longer life, the "Long and Healthy Life" component of the Human Development Index relies solely upon a nationsâ€™ estimated life expectancy as its measure of the healthiness and life length of its populace. However, the well-established health-longevity gender paradox, that compared to Males, Females experience inferior health outcomes but superior longevity, suggests that the life expectancy-based index is insufficient for the task and potentially misleading from a health policy perspective. Here new, fit-for-purpose policy focused Health Indices and Inequality measures are introduced and explored in the light of the paradox in 21st century China. Chinaâ€™s longevity and health experiences are consistent with the paradox and, furthermore, they are trending in different directions. The analysis reveals that much is lost by not including a health component along with longevity in the Human Development Index.
Keywords: Health Inequality; Inequality Measurement; Healthy-Longevity Paradox (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D63 I31 I32 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: Unknown pages
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-age and nep-cna
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.economics.utoronto.ca/public/workingPapers/tecipa-724.pdf Main Text (application/pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tor:tecipa:tecipa-724
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from University of Toronto, Department of Economics 150 St. George Street, Toronto, Ontario.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by RePEc Maintainer ().