Why Tax Foreign Exchange? Comments on a Proposed Tobin Tax
Mardi Dungey ()
No 1998.04, Working Papers from School of Economics, La Trobe University
At various times since Tobin floated the idea of a tax on foreign exchange transactions the concept has been revisited - particularly in times of financial market turmoil when it has been proposed as a means of reducing exchange rate volatility. Recently, Harcourt (1997) suggested a further refinement of the Tobin tax to apply only to 'speculative transactions'. This paper identifies three types of foreign exchange transactions - informed trades, liquidity trades and speculative trades - and highlights the difficulties in differentiating between these types of transactions. It is not clear whether some (or what) proportion of speculative trades is of benefit to the economy. Further, the undesirability of exchange rate volatility itself has not been established. In particular, the costs and benefits of exchange rate volatility have not been compared with the alternatives of interest rate volatility under a fixed exchange rate regime or the market innovations resulting from the imposition of a Tobin tax.
Keywords: Taxes; Financial Market (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Journal Article: WHY TAX FOREIGN EXCHANGE? COMMENTS ON A PROPOSED TOBIN TAX (1998)
Working Paper: Why Tax Foreign Exchange? Comments on a Proposed Tobin Tax (1998)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:trb:wpaper:1998.04
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from School of Economics, La Trobe University Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Stephen Scoglio ().